Little v. Thatcher
California Supreme Court
MOTION to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Superior Court of the County of Los Angeles. N. P. Conrey, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBeatty, C. J.
This is a motion to dismiss an appeal based upon the grounds—1. That the transcript was not served on the respondents; 2. That no sufficient transcript was filed; and 3. That the notice of appeal is not supported by an undertaking. As to the first ground, it is now admitted that the printed transcripts were duly served. As to the second, the objection is obviated by the filing of a supplemental transcript by leave of the court. The only question remaining relates to the three-hundred-dollar undertaking on appeal. The judgment in the action was rendered and entered February 20, 1906. A motion…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Schurtz v. RomerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- In re Estate of HeydenfeldtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Pacific Paving Co. v. BoltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
3Cited by7 opinions
- Magee v. WhitacreNevada Supreme Court · 1939
- Gerrior v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Chance v. ArculariusNevada Supreme Court · 1951
- Mathis v. Superior Court of City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Brownell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.