Legal Opinion

Corcoran v. Desmond

California Supreme Court

Decided September 24, 1886No. 11060PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Calaveras County, and from an order refusing to vacate and set aside the judgment. Motion to dismiss appeals. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Searls, C.

This is a motion to dismiss an appeal from a final judgment and from an order denying a motion made after judgment to vacate and set aside the judgment aforesaid.

The motion to dismiss is based upon the insufficiency of the undertaking on appeal, and upon the further ground that no sufficient transcript has been filed, as required by rule 2 of this court.

The judgment was in the ordinary form of a decree to foreclose under the mechanics’ lien law of this state.

The notice of appeal specifies that the defendants’ “appeal .... from the judgment .... in favor of said plaintiffs, .... and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sharon v. SharonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  2. People v. CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Chester v. Bakersfield Town Hall Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Bornheimer v. BaldwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Webb v. TresconyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Creek v. Bozeman Water Works Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1899
  3. McCobmick v. BelvinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  4. In re Estate of HeydenfeldtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Cent. Lumber & Mill Co. v. CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API