McCobmick v. Belvin
California Supreme Court
Motion to dismiss appeals from a judgment and two orders of the Superior Court of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
The Court.
— This is a motion by respondent to dis-
miss three appeals, upon the ground of want of undertaking on appeal.
The appellant, by one notice of appeal, gave notice *183that he appealed from the judgment entered in the case; from an order denying appellants’ motion to dismiss the action; and also from an order denying appellants’ motion to set aside the judgment by default. Only one undertaking on appeal was given, in the sum of three hundred dollars; and it did not refer separately to either of the appeals. “ The undertaking is no undertaking at all”; and there is no remedy under section…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Home & Loan Associates v. WilkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Corcoran v. DesmondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
3Cited by20 opinions
- People v. RyanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- People v. Van EwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Creek v. Bozeman Water Works Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1899
- Hernaiz Targa & Co. v. VivasSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1914
- In re Estate of HeydenfeldtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.