Home & Loan Associates v. Wilkins
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco- vacating a prior order refusing a writ of assistance, and from an order granting a writ of assistance. Motion to dismiss appeals. The facts are -stated in the opinion -of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.
Motion to dismiss appeals.
In this case appellant took appeals from, two orders, and filed one undertaking on appeal not distinctly referring to either appeal. The language used in the undertaking filed recites only - one appeal without distinguishing which of the two appeals was referred to. The undertaking so filed is no undertaking at all. It is so ambiguous that it must be regarded as if none had been filed. (People v. Center, 61 Cal. 191; Corcoran v. Desmond, ante, p. 100.)
An application is made to this court by appellant to be allowed to file the proper undertakings under section 954,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- Hastings v. HalleckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
3Cited by17 opinions
- Creek v. Bozeman Water Works Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1899
- McCobmick v. BelvinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Schurtz v. RomerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- In re Estate of HeydenfeldtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Spreckels v. SpreckelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.