Legal Opinion
In re Seth Adam Robbins
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided August 30, 2018No. 17-BG-767PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Per curiam
The Board on Professional Responsibility (the Board) recommends that respondent Seth Adam Robbins be suspended for sixty days from the practice of law and, prior to reinstatement, complete four hours of ethics-related Continuing Legal Education (CLE) because of clear and convincing evidence that Mr. Robbins failed to keep a client reasonably informed about the status of a matter, represented the client despite the likelihood that such representation would be adversely affected by Mr. Robbins's representation of another client, and represented the client where Mr. Robbins's professional…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- In Re ZilberbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- Jackson v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
- Smith v. JenkinsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- In Re HallmarkDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- In Re RyanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re DaileyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2020
- In re DavisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2023
- In re KlaymanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2022
- In re Michael M. WilsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2020
- In re Michael M. WilsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.