Legal Opinion

In Re Schoeneman

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided July 26, 2001No. 99-BG-477Published

1Opinion of the Court

777 A.2d 259 (2001)

In re Charles W. SCHOENEMAN, Respondent.

No. 99-BG-477.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Argued May 30, 2001.

Decided July 26, 2001.

David N. Webster, Washington, for respondent.

Michael S. Frisch, Senior Assistant Bar Counsel, with whom Joyce E. Peters, Bar Counsel, was on the brief, for Bar Counsel.

Before SCHWELB and RUIZ, Associate Judges, and GALLAGHER, Senior Judge.

RUIZ, Associate Judge:

After a complaint was filed with the Virginia State Bar alleging that Charles Schoeneman had neglected a case and failed to keep his client informed of its progress, Schoeneman chose…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. In Re RebackDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. In Re SpannDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. In Re RebackDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API