Legal Opinion
Stone v. Davis
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided April 22, 1981No. 80-585PublishedCited by 152 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCorrigan, J.
In this appeal, Ashtabula S & L advances six propositions of law which are considered infra.
I
Propositions of law Nos. 1 through 3, which may be treated together, read as follows:
“[1.] A federal truth-in-lending Regulation Z disclosure form promulgated by the Federal Reserve Board does not render a creditor using such form liable under Ohio law in either contract or tort for the non-existence of insurance for which a debtor has indicated his ‘desire’ on the disclosure form.
“[2.] A lending institution dealing at arm’s length with a prospective borrower prior to the creation of any…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Posin v. A. B. C. Motor Court Hotel, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1976
- Cooper v. Sisters of Charity of Cincinnati, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1971
- In re Termination of Employment of PrattOhio Supreme Court · 1974
- Umbaugh Pole Building Co. v. ScottOhio Supreme Court · 1979
- Betty B. Burgess, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of S. Reed Burgess, Jr., Deceased v. Charlottesville Savings and Loan AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1973
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by152 opinions
- Peggy Greenberg and Pamela Rossmann, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated v. The Life Insurance Company of VirginiaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Groob v. KeyBankOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- Needham v. the Provident BankOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
- Blon v. Bank One, Akron, N.A.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
- Lowery v. Guaranty Bank and Trust Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1991
147 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.