Legal Opinion

Stone v. Davis

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1981No. 80-585PublishedCited by 152 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCorrigan, J.

In this appeal, Ashtabula S & L advances six propositions of law which are considered infra.

I

Propositions of law Nos. 1 through 3, which may be treated together, read as follows:

“[1.] A federal truth-in-lending Regulation Z disclosure form promulgated by the Federal Reserve Board does not render a creditor using such form liable under Ohio law in either contract or tort for the non-existence of insurance for which a debtor has indicated his ‘desire’ on the disclosure form.
“[2.] A lending institution dealing at arm’s length with a prospective borrower prior to the creation of any…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Posin v. A. B. C. Motor Court Hotel, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Cooper v. Sisters of Charity of Cincinnati, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1971
  3. In re Termination of Employment of PrattOhio Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Umbaugh Pole Building Co. v. ScottOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Betty B. Burgess, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of S. Reed Burgess, Jr., Deceased v. Charlottesville Savings and Loan AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1973

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by152 opinions

  1. Peggy Greenberg and Pamela Rossmann, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated v. The Life Insurance Company of VirginiaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  2. Groob v. KeyBankOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Needham v. the Provident BankOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Blon v. Bank One, Akron, N.A.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Lowery v. Guaranty Bank and Trust Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1991

147 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API