Legal Opinion

State v. Lindsley

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 23, 1997No. 1 CA-CR 96-0638PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LANKFORD, Judge.

This decision is another in a long line of cases involving the scope of restitution to victims of crime. We once again find it necessary to address the nature of “economic loss” eligible for restitution under applicable Arizona statutes.

In this case, defendant Andrea Ann Lindsley appeals from an order requiring her to pay restitution to the victim in the total amount of $305. Because we find that the trial court properly ordered defendant to pay restitution on certain items but improperly awarded restitution for other items, we affirm the award as modified.

Briefly…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. ScherrWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  2. State v. EllisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
  3. State v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
  4. State v. FrenchCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
  5. State v. CummingsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. WilkinsonArizona Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State v. GuilliamsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  3. In Re William L.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
  4. State v. DixonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  5. State v. ZAPUTILCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API