Legal Opinion

State v. Scherr

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1960PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHallows, J.

Although the appellant raises many issues on this appeal, the basic and controlling one is whether in a criminal action wherein the defendant pleads guilty to a theft of $350 occurring between certain dates, as charged in the information, the court can, as a condition of probation, order restitution in excess of that amount.

The Wisconsin statute does not expressly limit the amount of restitution to the amount stated in the information or to the loss caused by the specific offense for which the defendant was convicted. Sec. 57.01 (1), Stats., 7 W. S. A., Probation, Paroles and Pardons, p. 384,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In re WebbWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
  2. People v. BeckerMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  3. State v. BarnettSupreme Court of Vermont · 1939
  4. State v. PetersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Biemel v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1888

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. People v. RichardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Huggett v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  3. State v. HarrisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1976
  4. State v. GerardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  5. State v. O'CONNORWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API