Legal Opinion

State v. Ellis

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 10, 1992No. 1 CA-CR 90-906PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KLEINSCHMIDT, Judge.

In this case, we hold that in assessing restitution for a loss of personal property, the measure of the victim’s full economic loss is the fair market value of the property at the time of the loss. The judge has discretion to use other measures of economic loss when fair market value will not make the victim whole.

The defendant was convicted of trafficking in stolen property. The victim testified that he had lost the following items: a pool cue which he had purchased used five years earlier for which he had paid $250; a sports jacket which was three years old and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. HawthorneSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  2. State v. IniguezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
  3. State v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
  4. State v. HinckleyCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1989
  5. People v. VournazosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
  2. In Re Andrew C.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  3. State v. GuilliamsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  4. State v. TupaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  5. State v. LindsleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API