Legal Opinion

State v. Wilkinson

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 2002No. CV-00-0365-PRPublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

McGREGOR, Vice Chief Justice.

¶ 1 We granted review to consider whether and to what extent the courts can order restitution for victims of an unlicensed contractor who performs incomplete and faulty work. We conclude that a trial court may award restitution when and to the extent that the criminal act of contracting without a license directly causes a victim’s economic loss.

I

¶2 John R. Porter, representing himself to be a licensed contractor, separately contracted with T.S. and N.L. (the victims) to perform remodeling work on their homes. T.S. purchased needed materials and paid Porter…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. Clayton Fountain, Thomas E. Silverstein, and Randy K. GometzCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  2. Rothweiler v. Superior Court of Pima CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  3. State v. GarnerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
  4. State v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
  5. State v. LindsleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Hanna v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2014
  2. Commonwealth v. McIntyreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  3. In Re Andrew C.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  4. State v. GuilliamsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  5. In Re Stephanie B.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2003

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API