State v. Wilkinson
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
McGREGOR, Vice Chief Justice.
¶ 1 We granted review to consider whether and to what extent the courts can order restitution for victims of an unlicensed contractor who performs incomplete and faulty work. We conclude that a trial court may award restitution when and to the extent that the criminal act of contracting without a license directly causes a victim’s economic loss.
I
¶2 John R. Porter, representing himself to be a licensed contractor, separately contracted with T.S. and N.L. (the victims) to perform remodeling work on their homes. T.S. purchased needed materials and paid Porter…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. Clayton Fountain, Thomas E. Silverstein, and Randy K. GometzCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Rothweiler v. Superior Court of Pima CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1966
- State v. GarnerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
- State v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
- State v. LindsleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Hanna v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2014
- Commonwealth v. McIntyreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
- In Re Andrew C.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- State v. GuilliamsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
- In Re Stephanie B.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.