Legal Opinion

State v. Cummings

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided August 22, 1978No. 1 CA-CR 3053PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

OGG, Judge.

Here we must determine if the trial court erred in ordering the defendant, as a term of probation in this burglary case, to make restitution for a loss incurred in a prior burglary committed by the defendant.

The appellant/defendant Calvin Cummings entered a plea of guilty to burglarizing his former employer on April 4, 1977. He was caught in the act and there was no loss to the victim. Approximately three weeks earlier in March, 1977, the defendant admitted he also had burglarized the same premises and that he had taken six cases of seafood which were later valued at $1870…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. LentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. People v. RichardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. State v. MontgomeryArizona Supreme Court · 1977
  4. People v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. IniguezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
  2. State v. ReeseCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
  3. State v. FancherCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
  4. State v. PearceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1988
  5. State v. DexterSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API