Legal Opinion

Nash v. Harris

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1881No. 6,539PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Appeal from an order in the Nineteenth District Court, City and Countyof San Francisco. Wheeler, J.

1Opinion of the Court

McKee, J.:

This is an appeal from an order sustaining a motion to set aside a judgment rendered against the respondent. •

The presumption in this Court is, that the motion was properly sustained; and the burden is upon the appellant to show that the decision of the Court below was erroneous. This can only be shown by the record of the proceedings which has been brought before us. An appellate tribunal cannot take judicial knowledge of proceedings in lower Courts. It can only act upon *243a record of the proceedings authenticated in the mode required by law.

When the motion was argued and decided in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pieper v. Centinela Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Fish v. BensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Herrlich v. McDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Waymire v. California Trona Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Farrell v. Oregon Gold Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Covina Union High School District v. JobeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API