Schroeder v. Mauzy
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Geo. H. Buck, Judge presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLennon, P. J.
The plaintiff recovered a judgment against the defendant in the sum of $900.21 upon a complaint which, for a cause of action, alleged, substantially, that the plaintiff, in her separate right, was the owner of a piano, valued at $1,000, which had been delivered into the care and custody of defendant pursuant to an oral agreement with plaintiff, whereby, for a valuable consideration, to be paid upon demand, defendant was to keep said piano on storage, and have the same insured against loss by fire for the benefit of plaintiff; that the defendant under this agreement did insure said piano, for…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Brison v. BrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- McDougald v. HuletCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Krasky v. WollpertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Ortega v. CorderoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Riverside Water Co. v. GageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Grimes v. NicholsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- Moore v. MoffattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Bell v. FitzCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
- Bell v. StadlerIdaho Supreme Court · 1918
- National Union Fire Insurance v. NasonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.