Legal Opinion
Holt v. Camus
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided September 30, 1999No. CIV. PMJ 99-532PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MESSITTE, District Judge.
I
Pro se Plaintiff Carolyn M. Holt sues Defendant Edward P. Camus for Defamation (Count I), False Light (Count II), and Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (Count III). The action arises in connection with testimony Camus gave during a deposition and statements that he allegedly republished to Judge Darlene Perry of the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County. Holt claims Camus made false statements regarding her sexual promiscuity and did so with the intent to jeopardize her career and reputation.
Camus has moved to dismiss the complaint under…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Jenkins v. McKeithenSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Harris v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Long v. Welch & Rushe, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2014
- Southern Volkswagen, Inc. v. Centrix Financial, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2005
- Henderson v. Claire's Stores, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2009
- Contech Stormwater Solutions, Inc. v. Baysaver Technologies, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2008
- Mazer v. Safeway, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2005
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.