Legal Opinion

Harris v. Jones

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 9, 1977No. [No. 58, September Term, 1977.]PublishedCited by 377 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMurphy, C. J.

In Jones v. Harris, 35 Md. App. 556, 371 A. 2d 1104 (1977), a case of first impression in Maryland, the Court of Special Appeals, in a scholarly opinion by Judge W. Albert Menchine, recognized intentional infliction of emotional distress as a new and independent tort in this jurisdiction. It found that a majority of the states now recognize intentional infliction of emotional distress as a separate and distinct basis of tort liability, apart from any other tort, thus repudiating earlier holdings that claims for emotional distress could not be sustained except as a parasitic element of damage…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Fletcher v. Western National Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  2. Alcorn v. Anbro Engineering, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Womack v. EldridgeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1974
  4. Knierim v. IzzoIllinois Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Rugg v. McCartySupreme Court of Colorado · 1970

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by377 opinions

  1. Snyder v. PhelpsSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  2. Twyman v. TwymanTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Petyan v. EllisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  4. Adler v. American Standard Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  5. Howard University v. BestDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984

372 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API