Pritchard v. Kraft Cheese Company
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtSutton, P. J.
1. “All persons who are interested in sustaining or reversing the judgment of the court below are indispensable parties in the Supreme Court and Court of Appeals; and they must be made parties to the bill of exceptions.” Edwards v. Wall, 153 Ga. 776 (113 S. E. 190); Emanuel Farm Co. v. Batts, 176 Ga. 552 (168 S. E. 316); Poston v. Durham, 177 Ga. 870 (171 S. E. 765); Code, § 6-1202.
2. This was a claim for compensation by George H. Pritchard as employee against Kraft Cheese Company, his employer, before the State Board of Workmen’s Compensation. The director entered an award denying…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Edwards v. WallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
- Emanuel Farm Co. v. BattsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
- Hancock v. Lizella Fruit FarmSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
- Poston v. Durham & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1933
- Cox v. Bibb Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Boyd v. DevaneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
- Darby v. City of VidaliaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1947
- Boyd v. DeVaneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947