Poston v. Durham & Co.
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.
1. All parties who are interested in sustaining the judgment of the court below, or who would be affected by a judgment of reversal, are indispensable parties in the Supreme Court and must be made parties to the bill of exceptions. Civil Code (1910), § 6176; Edwards v. Wall, 153 Ga. 776 (113 S. E. 190).
2. Where several parties brought separate suits against different defendants, and each of the defendants filed a counter-claim, and, pending the suits, one of the defendants purchased and obtained assignments of the counter-claims of the other defendants, and the cases were thereafter…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Edwards v. WallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
- Emanuel Farm Co. v. BattsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
3Cited by9 opinions
- Daniel v. Virginia-Carolina Chemical Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
- Koch Co. v. AdairCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
- Gehr v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
- Carter v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935
- Miller v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.