Legal Opinion

Boyd v. DeVane

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 15, 1947No. 15771Published

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, Justice.

1. All parties to the case who are interested in sustaining the judgment of the trial court are indispensable parties in the Supreme Court, and must be made parties to the hill of exceptions, or the writ of error will be subject to dismissal. Code, § 6-1202; Emanuel Farm Co. v. Batts, 176 Ga. 552 (168 S. E. 316) ; Edwards v. Wall, 153 Ga. 776 (113 S. E. 190); Teasley v. Cordell, 153 Ga. 397 (112 S. E. 287).

2. An order or judgment of the trial judge, entered upon an amendment praying that named persons be made parties plaintiff along with the original plaintiff and that the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Edwards v. WallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  2. Emanuel Farm Co. v. BattsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
  3. Teasley v. CordellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  4. Daniel v. Virginia-Carolina Chemical Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  5. Stanfield v. Downing Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1938

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API