Darby v. City of Vidalia
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtSutton, C. J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) It is well-settled law that all parties to a cause who are interested in sustaining the judgment of the court below are indispensable parties in the Court of Appeals, and must be made parties to the bill of exceptions or the writ of error will be dismissed. Pritchard v. Kraft Cheese Company, 72 Ga. App. 34 (1) (32 S. E. 2d, 862); Fitzgerald, Cotton Mills v. Murray, 69 Ga. App. 636 (26 S. E. 2d, 492); Parsons v. Kimsey, 74 Ga. App. 398 (39 S. E. 2d, 897). Tire plaintiffs in error contend that the State of Georgia is merely a nominal party to the proceedings…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Harrell v. Town of WhighamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
- Daniel v. Virginia-Carolina Chemical Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
- Gibbs v. City of Social CircleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
- Swafford v. ShirleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
- Ray v. City of LavoniaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Beazley v. DeKalb CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953