Legal Opinion
Eli Lilly and Company v. Aradigm Corporation, Defendant-Cross
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided July 20, 2004No. 03-1336, 03-1337PublishedCited by 201 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge CLEVENGER. Concurring opinion filed by Circuit Judge LOURIE.
CLEVENGER, Circuit Judge.
Eli Lilly and Company (“Lilly”) sued Aradigm Corporation (“Aradigm”) seeking, inter alia, to have two of its scientists recognized as joint inventors on Aradigm’s U.S. Patent No. 5,888,477 (“the '477 patent”). Based on a jury verdict, the United *1355States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana entered final judgment in favor of Lilly insofar as it ordered the Patent and Trademark Office to add one of Lilly’s scientists, Dr. DiMarchi, as an inventor. Eli…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Palmer v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Texas Digital Systems, Inc. v. Telegenix, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- United States Surgical Corporation v. Ethicon, Inc. And Johnson & Johnson Hospital Services, Inc., Defendants/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- C.R. Bard, Inc. v. M3 Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by201 opinions
- Conoco, Inc. v. Energy & Environmental International, L.C.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary v. QLT Phototherapeutics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
- Voda v. Cordis Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Broadcom Corp. v. Qualcomm Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Medichem, S.A. v. Rolabo, S.L.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
196 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.