Legal Opinion
C.R. Bard, Inc. v. M3 Systems, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided September 30, 1998No. 96-1165PublishedCited by 292 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court by Judge NEWMAN except for Part I.E (on-sale issue) and Part VI.C (attempt to monopolize). Judge BRYSON does not join Parts I.A-D of Judge NEWMAN’S opinion. The district court’s judgment concerning the on-sale bar is affirmed in separate opinions by Chief Judge MAYER and Judge BRYSON. The district court’s judgment concerning the attempt to monopolize issue is reversed-in-part by Judge NEWMAN’S opinion (Parts VI.A-B), which Chief Judge MAYER and Judge BRYSON join, and affirmed-in-part by Judge BRYSON’S opinion (Part II), which Chief Judge MAYER joins. Judge NEWMAN…
2Cases cited101 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by292 opinions
- Ntp, Inc. v. Research in Motion, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Odetics, Inc. v. Storage Technology Corporation, Visa International Service Association, Inc., Visa Usa, Inc. And Crestar Bank, Inc., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Eli Lilly and Company v. Aradigm Corporation, Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Bicon, Inc v. The Straumann CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- In Re Sang-Su LeeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
287 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.