Legal Opinion
Broadcom Corp. v. Qualcomm Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided September 24, 2008No. 2008-1199, 2008-1271, 2008-1272PublishedCited by 120 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LINN, Circuit Judge.
Qualcomm Incorporated (“Qualcomm”) appeals from a jury’s determination that Qualcomm infringed U.S. Patents No. 6,847,686 (“the '686 patent”), No. 5,657,317 (“the '317 patent”), and No. 6,389,010 (“the '010 patent”), owned by Broadcom Corporation (“Broadcom”). Qualcomm also appeals from the district court’s issuance of a permanent injunction against Qualcomm. Because the district court erred in its construction of claim 3 of the '686 patent, we reverse the jury’s determination of infringement of that patent and conclude that claim 3, as properly construed, is invalid.…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Ebay Inc. v. Mercexchange, L. L. C.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- 02 Micro International Ltd. v. Beyond Innovation Technology Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by120 opinions
- I4i Ltd. Partnership v. Microsoft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Activevideo Networks, Inc. v. Verizon Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Amgen Inc. v. F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Merial Ltd. v. Cipla Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Wordtech Systems, Inc. v. Integrated Networks Solutions, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
115 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.