Legal Opinion
Conoco, Inc. v. Energy & Environmental International, L.C.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided August 17, 2006No. 2005-1363PublishedCited by 172 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GAJARSA, Circuit Judge.
Conoco, Inc. (“Conoco”) brought suit against Energy & Environmental International, L.C. (“EEI”), Gerald Eaton, Ronald Grabois, and Michael Monahan for the alleged infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 5,244,937 (“the ’937 patent”) and 6,172,151 (“the T51 patent”) (collectively “the patents in suit”). EEI stipulated that the patents in suit were valid and enforceable for purposes of the litigation. On April 1, 2004, the district court entered a Mark-man order construing the patent claims. Conoco, Inc. v. Energy & Envtl. Int’l, L.C., No. H-01-4242 (S.D.Tex. Apr. 1, 2004)…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by172 opinions
- 02 Micro International Ltd. v. Beyond Innovation Technology Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Cordis Corp. v. Boston Scientific Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Voda v. Cordis Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Broadcom Corp. v. Qualcomm Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Celsis in Vitro, Inc. v. CellzDirect, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
167 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.