Rogers v. Union Central Life Insurance
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Vigo Superior Court.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.
The appellee’s complaint is founded upon promissory notes executed by Mary Jane Rogers, and a mortgage securing them executed by her and her husband, Newton Rogers.
The complaint is attacked by the assignment of errors *344jointly made by the appellants, and as the complaint is certainly good as to one of them, the attack must fail, even if it were conceded that it is bad as to one of them. It is well settled that a joint assignment of errors will not prevail if the complaint is good as to one of the appellants. Hoes v. Boyer, 108 Ind. 494; Hochstedler v. Hochstedler, 108 Ind. 506. We need not,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bayless v. GlennIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
- Quarl v. AbbettIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Vogel v. LeichnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Cupp v. CampbellIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Carmichael v. AdamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Johnson v. JouchertIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Lane v. SchlemmerIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- Cook v. WallingIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Voreis v. NussbaumIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
- Tomlinson v. BainakaIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.