Legal Opinion

Carmichael v. Adams

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 1883No. 10,476PublishedCited by 37 opinions

From the Monroe Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

— The provision of the Constitution which declares that “the right of trial by jury shall remain inviolate”' does not enlarge the right, but simply ordains that it shall remain as it was when the Constitution was adopted. It preserves a right, but does not extend it. At the time the Constitution was adopted, suits in equity were always, as of right, heard and determined by the chancellor. As the right to a trial by jury did not exist in chancery proceedings at the time the Constitution was adopted, the provision respecting trial by jury does not prohibit the Legislature from declaring that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hepburn and Dundas's Heirs v. Dunlop & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1816
  2. Henderson v. DickeySupreme Court of Missouri · 1872
  3. Phelan v. BoylanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1870

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Bernard Damsky, Olga Damsky and Henry Birns v. Honorable Joseph C. Zavatt, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
  2. Quarl v. AbbettIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Hiatt v. YerginIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. Jamaica Savings Bank v. M. S. Investing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1937
  5. Young v. VailNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1924

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API