Legal Opinion

Lane v. Schlemmer

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1888No. 13,845PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

The first paragraph of the appellant’s complaint alleges that she owns the land in controversy in fee; that she executed a note and mortgage to James M. Jamison ; that she undertook therein as surety for her husband, Samuel Lane; that she was then a married woman, and received no part of the consideration for which the note and mortgage were executed. Prayer that the mortgage be cancelled and her title quieted.

The second paragraph is substantially the same as the first, except that it sets out specifically the title of the appellant.

The third paragraph alleges that the appellant is the owner…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Mescall v. TullyIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Indiana, Bloomington & Western Railway Co. v. AllenIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Cupp v. CampbellIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Neidefer v. ChastainIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Barnett v. HarshbargerIndiana Supreme Court · 1886

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Feder v. FieldIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Haynes v. NowlinIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Johnson v. JouchertIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Estate of Ballard v. BallardIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Cook v. WallingIndiana Supreme Court · 1889

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API