Voreis v. Nussbaum

The appellant contends that the court erred in its conclusions of law upon the special finding of facts.

A synopsis of so much of the finding as is necessary to present the questions of law involved, is as follows:

On the 19th day of November, 1888, the defendant Lottie A. Voreis, who was at the time a married woman, executed her promissory note of that date, payable one year after date, to the order of William Bucklen, at a bank in Plymouth, and at the same time she, with her husband, George W. Vories, executed a mortgage upon her separate property to secure the payment of the note.

That George…