Legal Opinion

Quarl v. Abbett

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1885No. 9529PublishedCited by 83 opinions

Prom the Marion Superior Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

The material facts stated in the complaint ■of the appellee are these: Vincent A. Quarl and Samuel Lefevre are non-residents of the State, and the latter endorsed to the appellee two promissory' notes, executed by Bledsoe .and others to the appellee. At the time the notes matured the makers were insolvent, and so remained. At the time of the ■endorsement made by him, Lefevre owed debts amounting to ten thousand dollars, and was the owner of twenty-four shares of the capital stock of a corporation known as the Indiana Chair Manufacturing Company, and to cheat and defraud his -creditors,…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. The State of Rhode Island v. the State of MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1838
  3. Hahn v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  4. Bissell v. BriggsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1813
  5. Green v. Van BuskirkSupreme Court of the United States · 1869

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by83 opinions

  1. Pettis v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. Hiatt v. YerginIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. Johnston v. HunterWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Nysewander v. LowmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Board of Commissioners v. GwinIndiana Supreme Court · 1894

78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API