De La Fuente v. DCI Telecommunications, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER PROVIDING FINDINGS REQUIRED BY THE PSLRA, GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS
McMAHON, District Judge.
On September 6, 2002, Defendants DCI Telecommunications, Inc. (“DCI”), Joseph J. Murphy, Russell B. Hintz, Larry Shat-soff, and John Adams (collectively “DCI Defendants”) moved pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 60(b) to reopen this case for findings regarding compliance by the parties and their attorneys with Fed R. Civ. P. 11(b). These findings are required under Section 21D(c) of the Private Securities…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. GilbertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Rothman v. GregorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Pino v. Bank of New YorkSupreme Court of Florida · 2013
- Ho Myung Moolsan Co. v. Manitou Mineral Water, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. LeeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- In re Pfizer Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- In Re Connetics Corp. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2008
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.