Legal Opinion
Ho Myung Moolsan Co. v. Manitou Mineral Water, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 29, 2009No. 07 Civ. 7483 (RJH)(HBP)PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
PITMAN, United States Magistrate Judge:
I. Introduction
By notice of motion dated December 12, 2008, (Docket Item 64), plaintiffs move for leave to file an amended complaint. The proposed amended complaint would add the following claims against all defendants: (1) fraud in the inducement, (2) tortious interference with both contract and business relationships, (3) conspiracy to commit conversion, (4) conspiracy to commit theft of corporate funds, (5) conspiracy to commit breach of fiduciary duty, (6) conspiracy to commit misrepresentation, (7) violations of the Racketeer…
2Cases cited110 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- McCarthy v. Dun & Bradstreet Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
105 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Agerbrink v. Model Service LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- United States v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Westchester County Independence Party v. AstorinoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- National Gear & Piston, Inc. v. Cummins Power Systems, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Plasticware, LLC v. Flint Hills Resources, LPDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.