Berger v. Horlock
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order denying a new trial. Charles Monroe, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtAllen, P. J.
Appeal by plaintiffs from a judgment and an order denying a new trial.
It is averred in the complaint that one Alexander, in 1902, executed to Horlock a note for $2,600, secured by chattel mortgage on certain household goods contained in the Hotel Catalina, in the city of Los Angeles; that thereafter, in 1903, plaintiffs purchased said property so described in the chattel mortgage and, in writing, assumed and agreed to pay the note executed by Alexander, and, in addition, made another note for $400, also secured by chattel mortgage on said property. That said notes remaining unpaid in 1906,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Bailey v. Aetna Indemnity Co., of HartfordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
- Doherty v. California Navigation & Improvement Co.California Court of Appeal · 1907
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hammell v. BrittonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Page v. WalserNevada Supreme Court · 1923
- Inman v. Round Valley Irr. Co., Ltd.Idaho Supreme Court · 1925
- Aydelotte v. BloomCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
- Bealmear v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949