Legal Opinion

Page v. Walser

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1923No. 2546PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*396By the Court,

Sanders, J.:

This case has twice reached this court; once by way of an original proceeding in prohibition, instituted by the present appellants to have the lower court prohibited from proceeding to try the case upon its merits by reason of misjoinder of causes of action, in violation of an express inhibition of the civil practice act. On rehearing, the demurrer .to the petition for the writ was sustained and the proceeding dismissed, for the reason that, while separate causes of action were stated in the complaint, they were a part of one cause of action. 42 Nev. 111, 173 Pac.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Nielsen v. RebardNevada Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Lane v. StorkeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
  3. Walser v. MoranNevada Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Page v. WalserNevada Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Berger v. HorlockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re Panitz & Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1967
  2. Hotels El Rancho, Inc. v. PrayNevada Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Matter of KaufmanNevada Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Smart v. ValenciaNevada Supreme Court · 1926
  5. In re Copper Canyon Mining Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1957

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API