Aydelotte v. Bloom
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Santa Cruz County, denying a new trial. Lucas F. Smith, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtKebbigan, J.
This is an action to recover the reasonable value of services rendered as an attorney at law. The ease was tried with a jury, and in accordance with its verdict a judgment was entered in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant for the sum of $600. This appeal is from an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial.
The evidence upon both sides presented has been read and considered. Very briefly the facts are as follows: The plaintiff testified that he rendered the defendant certain services as an attorney at law; that the reasonable compensation for such services was $1,000. He…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Jackson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Knight v. RussCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Roche v. BaldwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Berger v. HorlockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
- Long v. SaufleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hatch v. BushCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963