Bailey v. Aetna Indemnity Co., of Hartford
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from an order denying a new trial. ,W. P. James, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Drew Pruitt, Charles L. Batcheller, and Thomas C. Ridgway, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtTaggart, J.
This is an action to recover from the surety on an undertaking given to release an attachment the amount of the judgment rendered against the attached debtor.
Judgment was for plaintiff, and defendant appeals from the judgment, and from an order denying its motion for a new trial.
Plaintiff brought an action in the superior court of Los Angeles county against the Pacific Furniture and Lumber Company to recover judgment on two promissory notes with interest, and attorney’s fees as provided therein, and on an account for work and labor. He caused an attachment to be issued and levied on the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Cook v. CeasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Porter v. PicoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Gardner v. DonnellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Whitney v. KelleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Smith v. FargoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Phillips v. PattersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Ferris v. Independence Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1932
- Berger v. HorlockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
- Koehler v. SerrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Patterson v. Pacific Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.