Legal Opinion

Bealmear v. Smith

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 8, 1949No. Civ. No. 16584PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

From a judgment in favor of defendants after trial before the court without a jury in an action to impress a constructive trust upon certain real property, plaintiffs appeal.

Pleadings: In the complaint plaintiffs allege that they conveyed a described parcel of real property to defendants upon defendants’ oral promise to reconvey the property to plaintiffs upon demand; that plaintiffs had demanded the property be reconveyed to them but that defendants refused to do so and were threatening to sell the property.

Evidence: At the trial defendant Virgil Smith testified that plaintiffs executed and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hitchcock v. RooneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Washko v. StewartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  3. Bowman v. CarrollCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  4. Crain v. Security Title Insurance & Guarantee Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935
  5. Berger v. HorlockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. El Rio Oils Ltd. v. Pacific Coast Asphalt Co.California Court of Appeal · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API