Legal Opinion

Schwob v. International Water Corp.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided November 10, 1955No. Civ. A. No. 1554PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RODNEY, District Judge.

This is an action by the plaintiff, claiming as an agent, for unpaid commissions on a contract negotiated between his principal, the defendant herein, and the City of Tel Aviv, Israel.

Defendant, after answering the plaintiff’s complaint and taking certain discovery process, now moves for summary judgment. The plaintiff, however, claims that several issues are in factual disagreement and insists that a trial is necessary. On motion for summary judgment, issues of fact may not be resolved,1 and well pleaded allegations of fact in a plaintiff’s complaint may not be refuted…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Sartor v. Arkansas Natural Gas Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Wood v. . Duff-GordonNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
  3. Frederick Hart & Co. v. Recordgraph CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
  4. Toebelman v. Missouri-Kansas Pipe Line Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
  5. Hawkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1877

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Chrysler Corp. v. Airtemp Corp.Superior Court of Delaware · 1980
  2. Dovberg v. Dow Chemical Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1961
  3. Bartsas Realty, Inc. v. NashNevada Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Dovberg v. Dow Chemical CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1961
  5. Richard Goettle, Inc. v. Tennessee Valley AuthorityDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API