Bartsas Realty, Inc. v. Nash
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Thompson, J.:
The appeal is from an order dismissing the plaintiff’s second amended complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Though imperfectly drawn, we think that enough is alleged to defeat a Rule 12(b) (5) motion and, therefore, reverse.
The second amended complaint sets forth three separate counts. Each rests upon an underlying oral agreement between the plaintiff, a licensed real estate broker, and the defendants. It is averred that the plaintiff agreed to reduce, by $5,000, its earned commission due from defendants for consummating the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Allison v. American Airlines, Inc.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1953
- Canister Co. v. National Can Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1951
- Schwob v. International Water Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1955
3Cited by12 opinions
- Klein v. Freedom Strategic Partners, LLCDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2009
- Blanck v. HagerDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2005
- Rodriguez v. DippCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Crockett & Myers, Ltd. v. NAPIER, FITZGERALLD & KIRBY, LLPDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2006
- Kahle v. KostinerNevada Supreme Court · 1969
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.