Legal Opinion

Bartsas Realty, Inc. v. Nash

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1965No. 4877PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Thompson, J.:

The appeal is from an order dismissing the plaintiff’s second amended complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Though imperfectly drawn, we think that enough is alleged to defeat a Rule 12(b) (5) motion and, therefore, reverse.

The second amended complaint sets forth three separate counts. Each rests upon an underlying oral agreement between the plaintiff, a licensed real estate broker, and the defendants. It is averred that the plaintiff agreed to reduce, by $5,000, its earned commission due from defendants for consummating the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Allison v. American Airlines, Inc.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1953
  2. Canister Co. v. National Can Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1951
  3. Schwob v. International Water Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1955

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Klein v. Freedom Strategic Partners, LLCDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2009
  2. Blanck v. HagerDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2005
  3. Rodriguez v. DippCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  4. Crockett & Myers, Ltd. v. NAPIER, FITZGERALLD & KIRBY, LLPDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2006
  5. Kahle v. KostinerNevada Supreme Court · 1969

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API