Legal Opinion
Toebelman v. Missouri-Kansas Pipe Line Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided October 16, 1942No. 8002PublishedCited by 187 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARIS, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiffs, minority shareholders of Missouri-Kansas Pipe Line Company (hereinafter called Mokan), brought a stockholders’ derivative suit in the District Court for the District of Delaware. An additional minority stockholder intervened upon the first cause of action alleged in the complaint. Jurisdiction is based upon diversity of citizenship.
The defendants moved to strike or dismiss the complaint. The court denied this motion. The defendants then moved for. summary judgment and filed affidavits in support of their motion. The plaintiffs moved for leave to inspect…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Whitaker v. ColemanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1940
- Keenan v. EshlemanSupreme Court of Delaware · 1938
- Rogers v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Continental Securities Co. v. . BelmontNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Weisser v. Mursam Shoe CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by187 opinions
- Warrior Tombigbee Transportation Company, Inc. v. M/v Nan Fung Etc., John K. Irish, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
- Sylvester Lockhart, Jr. v. Charles A. Hoenstine, Prothonotary of the Superior Court of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
- Doehler Metal Furniture Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- Empire Electronics Co., Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- Colby v. KluneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
182 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.