Legal Opinion
Chrysler Corp. v. Airtemp Corp.
Superior Court of Delaware
Decided November 20, 1980PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TAYLOR, Judge.
I
Plaintiff, Chrysler Corporation [Chrysler] seeks to recover $5,237,827.23 in one claim or $8,000,000 in another claim from defendant Airtemp Corporation [Airtemp] for services allegedly furnished by Chrysler to Airtemp.
Airtemp has moved to dismiss the complaint contending that it fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted and fails to join Fedders Corporation [Fedders] as a defendant under the requirements of Civil Rule 19. Alternatively, Airtemp seeks a stay of this action pending the determination of a related action by Chrysler against Fedders in the United…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Ebersole v. LowengrubSupreme Court of Delaware · 1962
- Oliver B. Cannon & Sons, Inc. v. Dorr-Oliver Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1973
- Coleman v. GarrisonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1975
- Guerini Stone Co. v. P. J. Carlin Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Roman Mosaic & Tile Co. v. VollrathSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Big O Tire Dealers, Inc. v. Big O Warehouse, an Illinois General Partnership, and Richard MacQueen Joseph Nuzzo, Alex Nuzzo and Paul ArraCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Vichi v. Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2012
- Chrysler Corporation v. Fedders Corporation, Salvatore Giordano, Sr., Salvatore Giordano, Jr., Bruno Giordano, Ignatius MacBrinn and Howard S. ModlinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- VICI Racing, LLC v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
- Brandt v. Hicks, Muse & Co. (In Re Healthco International, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1996
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.