Sartor v. Arkansas Natural Gas Corp.
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Jackson
This litigation, begun a decade ago, has been terminated by a summary judgment, and whether rightly so is the issue. The suit has weathered four adjudications, including two trials, in District Court and four decisions by the Court of Appeals.1 We will recite only such of its *621history as bears on the issues as to summary judgment, since we consider no other question.
Sartors are landowners in Richland Parish, Louisiana, who in March of 1927 leased their lands for natural gas development. The lease, so far as here important, provides that “. . . the grantor shall be paid one-eighth (%) of the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- The ConquerorSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Quock Ting v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Head v. HargraveSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Whitaker v. ColemanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1940
- Spring Co. v. EdgarSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by937 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Gulbenkian v. PennTexas Supreme Court · 1952
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Federal Insurance Co. of New YorkWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1963
932 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.