Legal Opinion

Vine v. Zoning Board of Appeals

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided January 3, 2006No. AC 25837PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SCHALLER, J.

The plaintiff, Wanda Vine,1 appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing her appeal from the decision by the defendant zoning board of appeals of the town of North Branford (board), granting the application of the defendant M & E Construction, Inc. (M & E),2 for a variance. The plaintiff claims that the court improperly determined that (1) the hardship claimed by M & E was not self-created, (2) the claimed hardship was not merely financial, (3) the “purchaser with knowledge” rule did not apply, and (4) material differences existed between the application for the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Bloom v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  2. Grillo v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  3. Reid v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  4. Hyatt v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  5. Pleasant View Farms Development, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Vine v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  2. Vine v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
  3. Cimino v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
  4. Vine v. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF TOWN OF NORTH BRANFORDSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  5. E & F Associates, LLC v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2015

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API