Legal Opinion

Cimino v. Zoning Board of Appeals

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided October 13, 2009No. AC 29251PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LAVERY, J.

The plaintiff, Christine Cimino, appeals from the judgment of the trial court denying her appeal from the decision by the defendant, the zoning board of appeals of the town of Woodbridge (board), which denied her request for variances. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly found that (1) the parcel at issue was not a preexisting, nonconforming use, (2) the variances were denied properly because there was no hardship, (3) the property is not worthless without the variances and (4) the variances were not consistent with the town’s master plan of development.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Devaney v. Board of Zoning AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
  2. Grillo v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  3. Reid v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  4. Vine v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  5. Abel v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cimino v. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF TOWN OF WOODBRIDGESupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  2. Cimino v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API