Legal Opinion

Morris v. . Carroll

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 19, 1916PublishedCited by 5 opinions

ActioN to redeem land alleged to be encumbered by a mortgage, and to recover possession of same, tried before Justice, J., at November Term, 1915, of Davidson. Defendant denied the right to redeem, claiming sole and unencumbered ownership of the property. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendant excepted and appealed.

1Opinion of the Court

Per CueiaM.

We have carefully examined the record, and find no sufficient reason for disturbing the result of the proceedings below. From a perusal of the pleadings, it appears that plaintiffs ■ are the children and heirs at law of M. L. Morris and his wife, Annie, both of whom are now deceased; that the title to the land, about 30 acres, was in Annie, the wife, and in 1901 the two became indebted to one Harris Nooe in the sum of $23.50 and executed a mortgage on the land to secure the same; that in 1907 Annie died, leaving plaintiffs, then minor children living with the father, the latter…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Owens v. Branning Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1915

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Davis v. . DoggettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  2. Roberson v. . MatthewsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  3. Jessup v. NixonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  4. Council v. Greensboro Joint Stock Land BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  5. Jessup v. . NixonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API