Bigelow v. McMillin
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtTownley, J.
The complaint states four alternative causes of action for the recovery of $7,629.91, arising out of a joint venture described in the complaint and bill of particulars. Under an agreement dated August 15, 1930, the plaintiff’s bankrupt was employed to act as manager of a syndicate formed to purchase a single block of stock of Insull Utility Investments, Inc. The activities of the manager comprised the purchase of this block of stock in 1930 and the sale of it in 1932. There were no dealings in the interval. Defendant is one of more than two hundred persons who participated in the syndicate.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Rodkinson v. HaeckerNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Crater v. . BiningerNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Joring v. HarrissCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
- Felbel v. KahnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
- Dows v. DurfeeNew York Supreme Court · 1850
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Yonofsky v. WernickDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1973
- Schuler v. BirnbaumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Jasper v. BernsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
- Kartalis v. Lakeland Plaza Joint VentureCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989
- Kartalis v. Commander Warehouse Joint Venture, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.