Legal Opinion
Joring v. Harriss
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided June 27, 1923No. 219PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHough, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). We shall not dwell on the pleadings, though argument has been based thereon, but prefer to meet the larger question; — whether on the facts shown plaintiffs have any right, in any form of action, to any share of the profits 'of selling the cotton in Spain.
Whatever rights plaintiffs enjoy obviously arise out of the agreements they made. Those written agreements consist of the contracts *978with Frierson and defendants, effective on the same day, February 28, 1917, fully set forth supra, — and of nothing else.
It is assigned for error that certain oral evidence…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bijur Motor Lighting Co. v. Eclipse Mach. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
- Watkins Salt Co. v. MulkeyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1915
- Felbel v. KahnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
- Felbel v. KahnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
- Schnerb v. Holt Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
3Cited by24 opinions
- Colonial Refrigerated Transportation, Inc. v. George P. Mitchell, George P. Mitchell v. Colonial Refrigerated Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- Chisholm v. GilmerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1936
- Dexter & Carpenter, Inc. v. HoustonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1927
- Tompkins v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938
- Estate of Koen v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1950
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.