Legal Opinion

Kartalis v. Commander Warehouse Joint Venture

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided June 2, 1989No. 05-88-01190-CVPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROWE, Justice.

Commander Warehouse Joint Venture sued Sam Kartalis to recover estimated operating expenses pursuant to a joint venture agreement. After a non-jury trial, the trial court granted judgment in favor of Commander for $7,503.71 damages, $1,278.51 prejudgment interest, and $3,065.00 attorney fees. In three points of error, Kartalis complains that the trial court erred: 1) in overruling his plea in abatement because no accounting had occurred prior to institution of the lawsuit; 2) in finding that all common law conditions precedent had occurred because no accounting had occurred…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Truly v. AustinTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Brown v. ColeTexas Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Dairyland County Mutual Insurance Co. of Texas v. RomanTexas Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Elsbach v. MulliganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  5. Joring v. HarrissCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Crum & Forster, Inc. v. Monsanto Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1994
  2. Biggs v. First National Bank of Lubbock, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1991
  3. Kartalis v. Lakeland Plaza Joint VentureCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989
  4. Estate of Wallock, in ReCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API