Legal Opinion
Yonofsky v. Wernick
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 26, 1973No. 64 Civ. 417PublishedCited by 82 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EDELSTEIN, Chief Judge:
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff 1 commenced this action on February 6, 1964 by filing a complaint charging defendant with wrongfully excluding him from a joint venture or partnership. Plaintiff contends that he and defendant entered into an oral agreement in April, 1963 to acquire and thereafter operate as a joint venture the assets of the Potentiometer 2 Division of the DeJur-Amsco Corporation 3 [hereinafter referred to as DeJur]. The complaint further alleges that the parties agreed that if plaintiff would use his “peculiar, unique and close relationship with DeJur…
2Cases cited120 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Provident Tradesmens Bank & Trust Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
115 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by82 opinions
- Brian Barlow v. George Ground, Officer 9129 L.O. Oberlies, Officer 1706 A. Tucker, Officer 9363 Ray Shay, Officer 3269Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Corporacion Venezolana de Fomento v. Vintero Sales Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Howard v. Klynveld Peat Marwick GoerdelerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Fariss v. Lynchburg FoundryCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
- Alan McSurely and Margaret McSurely v. John K. McClellan Thomas Ratliff, Individually and as Sometime Commonwealth Attorney for Pike County KentuckyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.