Legal Opinion
Hepburn Ex Rel. Hepburn v. Athelas Institute, Inc.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided July 1, 2004No. CIV.A. WDQ-02-3179PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
QUARLES, District Judge.
Pending is a Motion to Dismiss the Third-Party Complaint filed by Third-Party Defendant The National Center on Institutions and Alternatives, Inc. (“NCIA”). The motion will be granted for the following reasons.
I. Background
NCIA and Athelas Institute, Inc. (“Athelas”) both provide services to developmentally and physically disabled persons. 04/21/03 Memorandum Opinion at 3. Plaintiff Mark Hepburn resided at facilities operated by NCIA, but often spent daytime hours at Athelas facilities. Id. NCIA was still involved in this daytime care, however,…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Moor v. County of AlamedaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Equal Rights Center v. Archstone Smith TrustDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2009
- Crews v. County of NassauDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2009
- Hoa v. RileyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2015
- Mayor & City of Baltimore v. CSX Transp., Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2005
- Katka v. MillsDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2006
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.