Legal Opinion
Hoa v. Riley
District Court, N.D. California
Decided January 26, 2015No. C-12-2078 EMCPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING CROSS-DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
(Docket No. 146)
EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge
David F. Lopez, T. Gregory Stagnito, Bridge Transport, and Stag Leasing Inc. (collectively “Cross-Defendants”) have moved to dismiss Richard Riley, Raymond Matteucci, David Moore, Ronald Chan, Tammy Foss, Thomas Alioto, and George Moon’s (collectively “Cross-Claimants”) cross-complaint for equitable indemnity, contribution and declaratory relief. Cross-Claimants sought equitable indemnity and contribution from Cross-Defendants in the event they are held liable to Plaintiff Paul Hoa for violations…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Moor v. County of AlamedaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- George Acri v. Varian Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Felder v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1988
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- (PC) Cooks v. State of CA Dept. of Corrections and RehabilitationDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
- Bulfin v. RainwaterDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2021
- David v. BhanotDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2021
- Garot v. County of San DiegoDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2023
- Garot v. County of San DiegoDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2024
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.